ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the effect of preoperative percutaneous dilatational trache-otomy (PDT)in oral and maxillofacial surgery anesthesia versus traditional surgical tracheotomy (ST).Methods General data,vital signs,operation time,anesthetics,the amount of bleeding and complications during the procedure were analyzed after reviewing the clinical data of 124 cases under-going radical correction of oral and maxillofacial tumor plus flap transferring and repairing and trache-otomy during May 2013 to May 201 5.Results A total of 124 cases were divided into two groups:PDT group (group P,n =41)and ST group (group S,n =83).There was no significant difference of general data between the two groups.The incision length and operation time were significantly shorter and the amount of bleeding was remarkably lower in group P than those in group S (P <0.05),while the incidence of complications was not significantly different between the two groups.Conclusion PDT has more advantages over traditional ST and is a better airway approach in oral and maxillofacial surgery.
ABSTRACT
Objective:To observe the clinical effects of dexmedetomidine(DDM)under monitored anesthesia care(MAC)in oral and maxillofacial patients undergoing percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy(PDT).Methods:38 patients with oral and maxillofa-cial tumor undergoing PDT before surgery were randomly assigned into 2 groups(n =19).Patients in group D received a single-dose DDMof 0.5 μg/kg infused for 10 min;those in group Mreceived 2 mg of midazolam and 1 μg/kg of fentanil.Then all patients were given local anesthesia followed by PDT.MAP,HR and SpO2 were monitored before (T0 )and after drug administration (T1 ),at T2 (skin incision)and T3 (insert dilation catheter).Ramsay scorce,bucking,respiration depression and adverse cardiovascular reaction were recorded.All patients were followed up 24 h postoperatively for the observation of adverse recall of PDT.Results:Compared with T0 ,at T1 ,T2 MAP and HR in group D were lower,but MAP and HR at T3 in group Mwere higher(P <0.05).At T1 ,T2 and T3 ,MAP and HR in group D were significantly lower than those in group M(P <0.05).During operation,the incidence of bucking and respiration depression in group D was lower than that in group M(P <0.05).Conclusion:During PDT operation under MAC,a single-dose dexmedetomidine is effective in stablizing hemodynamics,reducing bucking and respiration depression.
ABSTRACT
<p><b>OBJECTIVE</b>To investigate the changes in hemodynamics and depth of anesthesia under monitored anesthesia care (MAC) in patients undergoing percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT).</p><p><b>METHODS</b>Forty-six patients with oral cancer were divided into two groups with 23 cases each: Local anesthesia group (group L) and MAC group (group M). Local and intratracheal surface anesthesia were performed with 2% lidocaine in group L. Midazolam, propofol and fentanyl were added to group M after local and intratracheal surface anesthesia, then PDT was carried out. During the induction, observer's assessment of alertness/sedation(OAA/S) scale was used to assess the depth of sedation. Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), state entropy (SE) and response entropy (RE) were recorded before anesthesia (basal value, T1), after local anesthesia (T2), after intravenous administration/before incision (T3), during incision (T4), during dilating with stretching pliers (T5) and endotracheal intubation (T6). A postoperative follow-up was taken in group M.</p><p><b>RESULTS</b>MAP and HR increased significantly at T4-T6 in group L and decreased at T3 (P < 0.05) with no change at T4-T6 in group M compared with those in T1. MAP and HR at T3-T6 in group M were obviously lower than those in group L. SE and RE at T3-T6 in group M were obviously lower than those at T1 or in group L (P < 0.01) and decreased significantly with the reduction of OAA/S scale (P < 0.05) during the induction. Intraoperative awareness in group M was not found through postoperative follow-up.</p><p><b>CONCLUSION</b>Patients undergoing PDT under MAC has more comfortability, more stable hemodynamics and no memory, so MAC is a better anesthesia for PDT than local anesthesia.</p>